"When you go around research labs, or you talk to start-ups, they have really good sensors, and then you ask them how long they work. They say 'six months'. That's great for R&D... but in industry, I want this robot to work for 10 years," he says.
"These videos are making people think this is real life. It's becoming out of hand now," he said.
。关于这个话题，一键获取谷歌浏览器下载提供了深入分析
Returning back to the Anthropic compiler attempt: one of the steps that the agent failed was the one that was more strongly related to the idea of memorization of what is in the pretraining set: the assembler. With extensive documentation, I can’t see any way Claude Code (and, even more, GPT5.3-codex, which is in my experience, for complex stuff, more capable) could fail at producing a working assembler, since it is quite a mechanical process. This is, I think, in contradiction with the idea that LLMs are memorizing the whole training set and uncompress what they have seen. LLMs can memorize certain over-represented documents and code, but while they can extract such verbatim parts of the code if prompted to do so, they don’t have a copy of everything they saw during the training set, nor they spontaneously emit copies of already seen code, in their normal operation. We mostly ask LLMs to create work that requires assembling different knowledge they possess, and the result is normally something that uses known techniques and patterns, but that is new code, not constituting a copy of some pre-existing code.
Here are today's Connections categoriesNeed a little extra help? Today's connections fall into the following categories: